Skip to main content

It’s Always a Number

It’s Always a Number

I was on a conference today and the first question set to the panel was about a number. 
I didn’t respond to the question but rather asked the conference, why is safety so good at asking dumb questions? It doesn’t matter whether its injury rates, percentages, zero or TRIFR etc, its always a number.
It took 50 minutes for the conference of safety people to ask the panel session a question about care, humanising and helping people tackle risk. 

I saw some safety propaganda recently about some big safety innovation, the next thing, the global way forward, a global collaboration, the number one idea and one would think with such language there would be some sense of vision attached to the announcement. Nup, the way forward was yet again another number. What is this industry that doesn’t know how to talk about people, personhood and helping? 

What is it about this industry that so lacks trust in others it multiplies systems and bureaucracy every time it spews more propaganda about yet another number. As long as Safety frames its world around numbers it will never have vision. As long as Safety deludes itself that numerics and metrics determine safety it will play the same merry-go-round and then wonder in 10 years why people have no interest in safety.

If a number is all you can see and talk about then you have no vision, you simply have a counting disorder. It’s so strange, when speaking to helping professions they never talk about numbers. Helping professions talk about their concerns to serve others, to help people be their best, to improve and develop quality services so that people can better live. People in helping professions recognize that a priority on numbers dehumanizes people, this is what the Nazis understood so well in World War 2. 

I once met an ex-prisoner of war from Dachau when I was 12 years of age and he showed me his number tattooed on his tongue. He explained how the Nazis dehumanized everyone by using numbers. If one ever mentioned a persons name the punishment was severe or one could be shot. The Nazis knew more than anyone that the best way to dehumanize people is to frame all discourse on numbers. We see this also in the workers compensations system. 

How insulting to call a company iCare that has no focus at all on caring. Ah yes, but they are great at numbers, particularly those that build their on bank accounts. How soul destroying to think that all that matters is a number or to be considered as a number. Just imagine if you child’s teacher didn’t call your child by name but changed their name to 13. 

I wonder how long you would keep your child in that school. Numbers are about efficiency (What Ellul called Technique) not about humans, community or helping. This is the tyranny that consumes Safety, it is so addicted to numbers it doesn’t know it. So, just have a look at any safety book title and see how it frames its message. If the title is framed around a number, the book will have no vision so don’t buy it. Anything framed around numbers will most likely be unhelpful, dehumanizing and unprofessional.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Curriculum and Bodies of Knowledge as Instructional Affordances

  Curriculum and Bodies of Knowledge as Instructional Affordances An affordance is created by design eg. a chair affords ‘sitting’ by design, a cup affords ‘drinking’ by design, a ball afford ‘kicking’ by design and water is designed for drinking and swimming. Understanding affordance is foundational to safety in design, usability and ethics. If one was talking about document usability and didn’t investigate affordances, I wouldn’t waste my time in its study. It is quite odd that Safety expects people to ‘speak up’ about un-safety when the culture of blaming common in safety suppresses it. Blaming and shame create psychological affordances. Slogans create affordances like; ‘safety is a choice you make’, ‘all accidents are preventable’ create a belief state that confirms and affirms safety myths about determinism and power. Such slogans hide beliefs that shape thoughts and actions. If you want to understand the nature of affordance, the following are helpful: · Letiche, H., ...

Covid 1984 – The Shake Hands Maskerade and Vial Diplomacy

  Covid 1984 – The Shake Hands Maskerade and Vial Diplomacy Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past George Orwell Boys from the Blackstuff  was a highly acclaimed British television drama series written by the Liverpool playwright  Alan Bleasdale . It was initially screened during the fall of 1982 following a period of fomenting civil unrest that culminated in the notorious inner city riots within its  Toxteth district . Amidst the  Thatcher-Reagan  alliance with its rubric of  trickle-down economics , profits were privatised and losses socialised. The ensuing wealth unlike blame failed to reach the downtrodden in the lowest echelons and that infamous sophism from the  illegitimate daughter of Satan  still resonates…….….. There is no such thing as society . Moreover, it reflects and aligns with the insipid vision of our peak safety body, which is merely a one trick dog and pony show and much...

There is Another Ethic than Zero Accidents

There is Another Ethic than Zero Accidents One of the beliefs of the Zero Accident Vision and Netwerk is: ‘zero is the only ethically sustainable goal for safety and health’ ( http://www.zeroaccidents.nl/over-het-netwerk/about/  ). The Zero Accident Vision group at least recognize that this is about a philosophy ( https://oshwiki.eu/wiki/Zero_accident_vision ) rather than about numerics. This philosophy is a philosophy of denial because its ‘is based on the belief that all accidents are preventable’. So, embedded in this philosophy is both an ideology of perfection and a denial of fallibility, randomness and uncertainty. A philosophy that is founded on the possibility of perfection and absolutes must have a trajectory that is dehumanizing. Despite this, the philosophy talks about ‘learning’ even though it cannot logically hold to such an aspiration in tension with its own absolute. Neither can it ‘leave room for the unexpected’ because the foundation for the philosophy founded...