Skip to main content

Spin, Nonsense Language and Propaganda in Safety

 

Spin, No
nsense Language and Propaganda in Safety

It wasn’t that long ago that the latest trend in safety was to label someone a ‘thought leader’ or a ‘. Of-course this was meaningless language because tradition, orthodoxy and zero wants no disruption, compliance is the god of Stasis (zero). Even when safety declares it is ‘different’ it uses the same language as safety orthodoxy and tradition to spin the idea that something is different, when it is not. It still remains anxiety about: measurement, quanta, objects and numerics. There can never be leadership, imagination, creativity or inspiration in zero, the global mantra for the safety industry.

Oscar Wilde once said that: ‘society forgives criminals but never forgives the dreamer’.

 I wrote recently about the visionary imagination and visionaries:

·         The-visionary-imagination-margaret-atwood

·         The-visionary-imagination-and-marion-mahoney-griffin

·         The-visionary-imagination-louisa-lawson

We see in these women what the visionary imagination is. These women are the real ‘thought leaders’ and disrupters’. Each one running against, the addiction to power, technique (Ellul) and the ideology of zero.

When it’s always a number personhood comes second. There is nothing on personhood, ethics or fallible humans in either the AIHS BoK or the safety curriculum. Indeed, regardless of label in safety, it’s always about hazards, controls and injury rates.

 The strongest consistency in language in the safety industry is the favourite claim to the word ‘professional’. The label doesn’t mean you are professional in ethical conduct, it just means you like the word. Of course, helping and care are essential to the act of being professional and zero can only end in the brutalism of fallible persons.

Visionary imagination starts by rejecting the ideology of compliance. Visionary imagination emerges from the Faith-Hope-Love-Justice dialectic and most often is articulated through Poetics. Visionary imagination stands in contrast to the accumulation of power, dehumanizing or persons and orthodoxies vest in masculinst power.

An Ethic of Risk and Transdisciplinarity are the starting point for re-envisioning new ways of tackling risk that respects persons and rejects the tyranny of zero.

 The next book in the series on risk to be released soon demonstrates: how this can be done, why it works and gives case-study evidence of its success in a large global organization.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Safety Works in Mysterious Ways….

Signs On a Church Refurbishment Site Spotted these signs on the fence of a Church refurbishment project today. When I saw the irony (is that what you would call it?), I laughed until I stopped……
Post a Comment
Read more

Systems as Imagined v Systems in Practice

Systems as Imagined v Systems in Practice The recent NSW Supreme Court decision,  Attorney General of New South Wales v Tho Services Limited (in liquidation) (ACN 000 263 678) [2016] NSWCCA 221  is another in a long line of decisions that highlight the disconnect between safety management systems as they are documented, and what occurs in practice. Documented safety processes are important.  They provide guidance on how safety is managed and evidence that an organisation is meeting its obligations.  However, where an accident reveals long-term, systemic non-compliance with obvious safety expectations documented safety processes do not provide a defence, often they do not provide mitigation, and in cases such as this they are an aggravating circumstance.  As the Court noted: The vast range of induction and supervising protocols adopted by the respondent or in force at its premises serves not to relieve the respondent of its responsibility for safety but on...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Critique of Pure Reason

I was doing some research on incident investigation tools today and recalled this VERY popular post from last year. The SCM nicely allows us to take our pick of endless causes and to assign blame to not only the worker but management, the system and objects as well – no wonder it and ICAMembert are so popular: A Critique of Pure Reason –  (With Apologies to Immanuel Kant) There is not a week goes by without someone suggesting I should read James Reason or that I haven’t read James Reason. I am also advised that I don’t read James Reason properly because somehow all worldviews must be in agreement, particularly in safety. In the short history of safety, the works of Reason particularly, the Swiss Cheese metaphor (causation theory) and Human Error theory have become attributed as fact. Should one disagree with Reason’s theories one obviously can’t read or hasn’t read Reason’s work properly. It is interesting to note the way that Reason is used to invoke reductionist ...
Post a Comment
Read more