Skip to main content

How Effective Are Your Conversations About Risk?

 How Effective Are Your Conversations About Risk?

One of the reasons why Safety is so obsessed with: paperwork, systems and audits, is that it is so poor at conversation. In the Social Psychology of Risk (SPoR) we have conducted thousands of workshops on conversation skills and not one risk and safety person has demonstrated even the slightest competence in the basics of conversation. When it comes to the fundamentals of helping, listening, caring and conversation it seems Safety is not interested.

 

When we run our workshops most of what we cover is deemed ‘new’ to risk and safety people. Yet, in the helping professions most of what we do is considered a 101 introduction.

 

Learning to conduct a conversation about risk is not easy. Talking and telling are not conversation.

 

Most of the organisations we work with, take more than a couple of years to become proficient and effective in the art of conversation. Especially, when it comes to skills in listening.

 

Most who attend Conversations workshops have never been taught about listening, how to listen or what listening is. Unfortunately, Safety is characterized by a mindset of telling, not listening. You will find nothing globally in the risk and safety sector that promotes the power of listening. Nothing in the AIHS Body of Knowledge or Safety curriculum points towards: the art of listening, skills in helping or an ethic of care.

 

When it comes to safety, it’s always about numbers, counting, regulations, paperwork, objects and telling. The behaviourist assumption is, you have been told now you know what to do. This is a perfect assumption for development of a blaming culture.

Another assumption of risk and safety culture is that conversation is easy and doesn’t require learning. It is assumed that if you have a mouth and ears that is all that is required. Yet, in the Discipline of counselling we know it takes years to learn how to be a good listener. Who would think that another discipline apart from engineering could teach safety something about helping? One thing a Transdisciplinary approach teaches is that you don’t seek out counselling, helping or conversation from engineering. Resilience cannot be ‘engineered’.

 

One of the best places to start in learning about conversation and helping is the work of Gerard Egan, The Skilled Helper. One thing is for sure, Egan is on no reading list in safety.

 

Soon we will be releasing book 10 in the series on risk that tells the story of a global company that has improved safety by dropping the ideology of zero and taking up the skills of conversation across the organization. It is a story of what works . It is a very practical story and a story we could tell over and over. Learning SPoR changes the whole way people engage in tackling risk.


At the same time as the book release we will also be releasing sales of the Conversation Role Play Cards that help people develop skills in conversation. These are so helpful in Inductions, training programs and developing safety people as helpers. The cards are only available to people who have been trained in SPoR. Look for notification of the launch of the book and cards in the next Centre for Leadership and Learning in Risk Newsletter (https://spor.com.au/downloads/newsletter-archive/ ).

The Introduction to SPoR free offer has now be running for over a year and with great success. The next free offer will commence in June 2020 (https://cllr.com.au/product/an-introduction-to-the-social-psychology-of-risk-unit-1-free-online-module/).

The Conversation Role Play Cards are based on the triarchic model of tackling risk in: Workspace, Headspace and Groupspace. It is amazing how when one shifts away from the binary dumb down approach to risk that safety improves.

When one acknowledges that humans make decisions with One brain and 3 Minds, safety improves.

None of the tools or skill development cards offered by SPoR are about gimmicks. All the semiotics and tools being used in organisations globally to improve risk and safety with SPoR testify that it works.

Once you drop the ideology of zero and take up a climate of helping and care, safety improves.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Curriculum and Bodies of Knowledge as Instructional Affordances

  Curriculum and Bodies of Knowledge as Instructional Affordances An affordance is created by design eg. a chair affords ‘sitting’ by design, a cup affords ‘drinking’ by design, a ball afford ‘kicking’ by design and water is designed for drinking and swimming. Understanding affordance is foundational to safety in design, usability and ethics. If one was talking about document usability and didn’t investigate affordances, I wouldn’t waste my time in its study. It is quite odd that Safety expects people to ‘speak up’ about un-safety when the culture of blaming common in safety suppresses it. Blaming and shame create psychological affordances. Slogans create affordances like; ‘safety is a choice you make’, ‘all accidents are preventable’ create a belief state that confirms and affirms safety myths about determinism and power. Such slogans hide beliefs that shape thoughts and actions. If you want to understand the nature of affordance, the following are helpful: · Letiche, H., ...

Systems as Imagined v Systems in Practice

Systems as Imagined v Systems in Practice The recent NSW Supreme Court decision,  Attorney General of New South Wales v Tho Services Limited (in liquidation) (ACN 000 263 678) [2016] NSWCCA 221  is another in a long line of decisions that highlight the disconnect between safety management systems as they are documented, and what occurs in practice. Documented safety processes are important.  They provide guidance on how safety is managed and evidence that an organisation is meeting its obligations.  However, where an accident reveals long-term, systemic non-compliance with obvious safety expectations documented safety processes do not provide a defence, often they do not provide mitigation, and in cases such as this they are an aggravating circumstance.  As the Court noted: The vast range of induction and supervising protocols adopted by the respondent or in force at its premises serves not to relieve the respondent of its responsibility for safety but on...

Safety Works in Mysterious Ways….

Signs On a Church Refurbishment Site Spotted these signs on the fence of a Church refurbishment project today. When I saw the irony (is that what you would call it?), I laughed until I stopped……