Does Safety Have A Soul?
In
Chapter 1 of my latest book Envisioning Risk, Seeing, Vision and Meaning
in Risk, I discuss the linguistics of ‘soul’ in art, music and movies.
In the top 500 songs of all time, we find endless reference to spirit,
transcendence, Afterlife, soul and the unconscious. Most of these references to
soul and spirit in music are connected to the ability to see and envision
something others cannot see.
What
we profess and the way we profess matter for the creation of meaning and
identity. In Art, Literature, Music, Song and Movies (Poetics) we accept
without question all forms of metaphysical, non-measurable concepts as
essential for expressing meaning about life, love and loss. When it comes to
love, life and loss, we turn to Poetics not
Safety, to explain the mysteries of fallibility-transcendence in suffering and
love.
Envisioning
is about a way of seeing that accepts the ‘Poetic Imagination’. Envisioning is
a form of perception that Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics
(STEM) doesn’t understand. Yet, look at how STEM tackles the mysteries of
fallibility, myth and suffering and it is flooded with metaphor of
transcendence and metaphysics that is doesn’t know it uses. This is why Safety
tries to turn to the wicked problem of risk and ends up in the language of
zero, infallibilities and heroics.
The Poetic Mind knows that when things go wrong, the last thing
a fallible person wants to hear is: statistics, numeric, metrics and blame. The
Poetic Mind knows that objects don’t matter and that persons do. The Poetic
Mind knows that a verse of a song can touches the human heart with what she
needs most. The Poetic Mind knows that the last word ever used to describe love
is ‘duty’. Breaching the Act and Regulation is an irrelevance to a person who
has been harmed.
Of
course, the language of the ‘soul’ is unique to Poetics. The language of the
‘soul’ connects the emotional mysteries of fallibility with the need for
comfort, belonging, trust and care. There is nothing more alien to the ‘Poetics
of the Soul’ than the stasis of zero. There can be no envisioning in zero. Zero
dulls all perception under the command to count. If we want to connect to
people who live each day in the realities of tackling risk, we need to know a
Poetics of Safety
The ideology of zero doesn’t know how to
connect to people. It doesn’t ‘care’ or ‘help’ people, it’s only goal and
language are a number. When things go wrong in tackling risk, people step
outside of the safety industry to find comfort in professions that help and
care.
Comments
Post a Comment